Ebooks

At least she didn’t fake it…..

Forty-one years on from her first (and sadly last) West End theatrical stage appearance in Funny Girl, Barbra Streisand has been back in London in concert, helping to inaugurate the 02 Arena as a venue that finally makes sense of the white elephant of the Dome and has turned it into a handsome addition to London’s large-scale entertainment portfolio.

I went last night, and though the venue is undeniably large and the demand for the restaurants currently far outstrips the supply so I was forced to visit the Ben and Jerry’s ice-cream stand at the Vue cinema upstairs for a pre-show snack, the seats are actually comfortable, the staff universally friendly and polite, and the tube station is right next door – compare and contrast with the refurbished but still ghastly Wembley Arena.

That, of course, was the scene of Streisand’s last come-back concert 13 years ago, so she’s gone up in the world and so, too, have her prices: from a ridiculous £360 top then, to an absurd £500 now – a price that got a couple of friends I know last night seats in the 40th row of the flat arena area. And while I still feel uncomfortable about an egotism — whether her own or that of her management, but in either case she is complicit in — that, instead of rewarding the fans for their loyalty (as witness Prince’s example here, where all seats for his 21-night run at the Arena will be just £31.21) seems intent on fleecing them instead, nobody is, I suppose, forcing us to pay up. There is, of course, an inverse logic that enhances the value of something that costs more, and feeling that’s it’s exclusivity increases the experience or leaves you feeling ripped off is surely purely in the eye – and wallet – of the receiver.

As it is, I thought that my own £100 (plus £12.50 service charge) was well spent, in the end, for a seat behind the stage. Sure, I often only got a side or rear view, but then how different is that to seeing Betrayal at the Donmar Warehouse? In a programme that highlighted her theatrical roots – beginning with the Funny Girl overture performed by the lavish 58-piece orchestra and leading into her first song, ‘Starting Here, Starting Now’ by Maltby and Shire (who, coincidentally, have a new show premiering in London this very week, when Take Flight opens at the Menier Chocolate Factory on Wednesday) – we had songs from Lloyd Webber, Bernstein and Sondheim, Rodgers and Hammerstein, and Maury Yeston, amongst others.

And to emphasise the Broadway connection, she was joined by four Broadway actors: Hugh Panaro (last seen in the title role of the short-lived Lestat, and before that doing a two-year stint in the title role of The Phantom of the Opera), Michael Arden (late of the short-lived Twyla Tharp Dylan musical The Times They Are A-Changing), Peter Lockyer (last of the comparatively short-lived Broadway version of La Boheme by Baz Luhrmann) and Sean McDermott (last seen on Broadway as a take-over Danny Zucko in Broadway’s last revival of Grease that ended in 1998, a role to be played in Broadway’s next Grease, of course, by a performer chosen by reality TV). Those names, of course, would have meant nothing to the bulk of last night’s London audience, but it also does highlight a problem – and proves why Streisand herself was so wise to cultivate her career away from Broadway: there simply isn’t much of a career to be had there any longer. After principal roles for all of these actors there, here they are now, doing back-up work.

And it was a fact also brought home to me by a conversation I had with the person sitting next to me, who had seen Streisand’s last London appearance 13 years ago – and was worried that if he didn’t see this show, might discover that in 13 years time from now it would be too late. By then, Streisand would be 79 – so I said “not necessarily – Barbara Cook, after all, turns 80 this October and is still going strong”. And he replied, “Who’s Barbara Cook? I’ve never heard of her!” It’s his loss. Cook’s career, begun like Streisand’s on the Broadway stage, has been continued on the concert and cabaret one, but wider celebrity has eluded her.

Yet Cook, who lives inside and through her material and has grown with it to a peak of artistic expression and perfection, is the greatest contemporary singer alive (in my humble opinion). And though Cook may, famously, go up on her lyrics from time to time when she performs live (as she does all the time, not every 13 years), that only amplifies her humanity. Streisand, as I was able to see for myself from the rear view I was getting, has every line and lyric autocued. Bizarrely, it was only when Streisand went off script last night for an anecdote about someone (whose name she then couldn’t recall) who played New York’s Bon Soir nightclub with her early on in her career that she felt not just unguarded but also vulnerable. While Cook, at 79, sounds as good as she ever did because she is all about interpretive truth, Streisand by comparison negotiates gingerly around some of the frayed edges of her voice to try to continue reclaiming the technical perfection that has always been one of her calling cards.

Still, at least (to borrow a lyric from Funny Girl’s ‘Don’t Rain on My Parade’) she doesn’t fake it – Liza Minnelli (and Connie Fisher, for that matter) have been known to mime to recorded music. Performing ballads like the Legrand classic (to lyrics by Alan and Marilyn Bergman) ‘What Are You Doing the Rest of Your Life?’ or ‘You Don’t Bring Me Flowers’ (Neil Diamond, to lyrics by the Bergmans again) brings out her expressive, lyrical strengths. She may be less secure on the belt now, but she’s still a bracing performer.

4 Comments

a very truthful review regards restaurents etc at the 02 although i much preferred wembley i had a far superior view for my £105 ticket then than my £215 on the wed opening night. she was only a dot on the horizon and we shouldn,t have paid more than £100.i would have enjoyed the show much better if the seat had been a bit better accoustics not too good either maybe it was the distance travelled up to the roof that distorted the sound which is a shame as i have been an ardent fan for 40 years but wouldn,t go again if she came back even if i could afford the package hotel and flight from scotland also

Ah, Mr. Shenton, bless your heart; how wonderful that you're such a fan of Barbara Cook; and no wonder that your friend never heard of her. I saw Ms. Cook in concert about five years ago, and she was lovely--but there's no comparison with her and the phenomenon that is and has always been Barbra. I saw Barbra last November in Atlanta, and it was total goose bump time; she combines drama and music and charisma and that indefinable SOMETHING in a way that nobody ever has or will--as Tony Bennett said, 100 years from now people will still be marveling at her artistry. What she is happens once. Be grateful you were there.

I totally agree with Manning. There's absolutely no comparison. I remember a remark Pauline Kael made when reviewing the 1972 film, "Up the Sandbox." She said, "Barbra Streisand has never seemed so multi-radiant. Like Garbo, she's a complete reason for going to a movie." Bingo! Spot-on! ((We miss you, Pauline.....)) Ms. Cook is wonderful, of course, but I miss the supreme dramatic command that Streisand possesses (auto-cues notwithstanding; actually, that just proves how great an actress Barbra reall is----even when scripted, she seems fresh and natural) and I think the very texture---the tessitura, if you will---of the Streisand sound is far, far superior. It is a unique sound, unmatched anywhere on planet earth-----that tall, vertical quality to the voice that contains both power and purity. It's one of a kind. She's a true super-nova who radiates the gift of true talent. And what is a star for if not to shed light????

I'll support your preference for Barbara over Barbra. I could never quite take that Brooklyn nasality on Streisand's top notes (Streisand singing Ave Maria is one of the great travesties in musical history). Mostly though, my complaint is that she never lets me forget that it's Barbra singing. She "barbrizes" every song. Barbara Cook, by contrast, is a conduit for the composer and lyricist and makes you marvel at the craft of the songwriter as much as the skill of the singer. I'm sure she's the interpreter of choice for many songwriters. Barbra might earn you more royalties but Barbara will leave for history the best possible account of what you wrote.

SEARCH THE STAGE

Content is copyright © 2008 The Stage Newspaper Limited unless otherwise stated.

All RSS feeds are published for personal, non-commercial use. (What’s RSS?)