The Stage

Blogs

Shenton's View

We’ve got (another) little list or two…

In Britain we’re obsessed with hierarchy, honours and pecking orders. On New Year’s Eve, the Queen’s New Year’s Honours were issued, and of course the list was big on our Olympic heroes from last year’s Beijing events; but on the arts front, the pickings were surprisingly slim. Despite a public campaign on behalf of Bruce Forsyth to be elevated to a knighthood (he already has a CBE), which included an online petition signed by more than 15,000 people, he was overlooked - according to a story in the Daily Telegraph, he was out of the running because he received his CBE in 2005, so was unlikely to be considered for an honour again until at least 2010. A source is quoted from within the Cabinet Office explaining, “There is a convention within the honours system that individuals who have received an award in the past will not be considered for another honour for five years. It is not a hard and fast rule, but unless someone does something exceptional, it tends to be adhered to.”

At least that’s now clear. But what do the awards themselves mean? When I wrote a story on Tuesday for an American website about Michael Sheen being awarded an OBE and Liz Smith receiving an MBE, the editor replied requesting clarification as to what those awards meant.

But the particular hierarchy of individual awards doesn’t mean much even to us: as a Guardian editorial pointed out on Tuesday, “Only medievalists will have any idea why the bauble being handed to top trade official Andrew Cahn is called a Knight Commandership of the Order of St Michael and St George. Even the common MBE signifies membership of the Order of a British Empire that has ceased to exist - rendering it anachronistic at best, and offensive at worst. Nowadays, the MBE is supposed to be about hands-on local community involvement, with the rarer CBEs and knighthoods reserved for nationally recognised work. But this rationalisation only reinforces the system’s class-bound origins”.

But it’s difficult, amongst the 966 people named, to even find the names of all the arts people that have been recognised. It wasn’t until I saw The Stage’s story that I realised that Katie Mitchell had been awarded an OBE, too, for her services to drama. That service may largely be to inspire controversy, as I wrote here about the critical response to her National Theatre production of Attempts on Her Life in 2007; but clearly someone at the Cabinet Office is paying attention.

And it wasn’t until I spotted a story on another website this morning, www.londontheatre.co.uk that I saw that Jennifer Sealey, artistic director of disabled-led theatre company Graeae since 1997, has been appointed an MBE.

At least here at The Stage the own annual list in we honour the great and good (and sometimes bad but brilliant) amongst theatrical movers and shakers is easier to find: just buy a copy of this week’s paper. The “pre-release” of a tally of the most influential “top ten” figures of the last decade of the Stage 100, which Alistair Smith has previously blogged about here, has already created a spirited discussion on The Guardian blog, since Lyn Gardner suggest that what The Stage “means by influence doesn’t necessarily tally with other people’s definitions - certainly not mine.”

Lyn then goes on to propose her own list of those she deems should figure on a current list of the most influential figures in the theatre. But in fact she has confused the two lists that this paper has produced - the ten-year survey, and our current tally - since many of her own nominations make it into our list this year.

But the problem with any list are the omissions as much as the inclusions, and having set a ceiling of 100 entries, we’ve had to leave a lot of worthy contenders off. But the survey specifically casts a light on the previous twelve months’ worth of activity, and in that light, it is interesting to see how Andrew Lloyd Webber - having taken the pole position across the previous ten years - has, for the second year running, gone into second place behind Cameron Mackintosh, whose ongoing programme of theatre refurbishments in the West End, as well as bringing in a new production this year of Oliver! and his international producing profile, have seen him more active than Lloyd Webber, even if ALW continues to court a more public profile with his TV judging work (which last year saw him the lead panellist on the Oliver! show, and this year will see him trying to bring victory back to Britain in the Eurovision Song Contest, by not just writing the entry but also presiding over a live TV search for who will perform it).

It’s also interesting to observe the slide, from pole position in 2005 and joint first position in 2006, to 7th in 2007 and now 17th this year for David Ian. He’s still active, but not nearly as attractive as he was when he had the corporate might of Live Nation behind him; but then what is still striking about theatreland is that, for all the corporate animals that have come to dominate the entertainment world, we still have a defiant group of independent producers still carving out their own distinctive niches here. The top twenty list this year includes the irrepressible Bill Kenwright (about to return to the West End with all guns blazing, with three openings lined up in the next couple of months), Nica Burns and Max Weitzenhoffer, and the return to the list of David Pugh and Dafydd Rogers, as well as the first appearance in the Top Ten of Judy Craymer, who steered Mamma Mia! into what is rapidly turning into the most successful stage-to-screen transfer of all time.

We’re not the only ones compiling Top 100 lists — last April the Sunday Telegraph set out its own stall of the 100 most powerful people in British culture. Intriguingly, they put the National’s Nick Hytner ahead of everyone (he’s only third in our list), in a list whose Top Ten is half theatre — Lloyd Webber’s at position 5, Cameron Mackintosh at 7, Michael Grandage at 8 and Kevin Spacey at 10 (one ahead of our own ranking of him at number 11).

2 Comments

Report this comment

The hierarchy of civic honours can indeed be confusing. A couple of months ago, when I was compiling a brief biog of Peter Brook, I discovered that he was an Officier de la Legion d'Honneur, but had no way of conveying in the para allotted me that in France's main order of state honour, in contrast with Britain's order of the British Empire, the rank of Officer is *above* that of Knight.

Indeed ... our "Give Bruce Forsyth a Knightood" Group now has 1,000 new members in the last 3 days ... nearly 16,000 now!

In the previous New Years Honours, the excuse had been that "they" were waiting until Bruce Forsyth was in his 80th year. Bruce was 80 in February 2008. This time, the red herring is the 4 or 5 year delay from the award of the CBE.

The complaints about the voting on Strictly Come Dancing are paling into insignificance compared to the backlash there is from the British public to this scandalous omission. Sir Sean Connery was 69 when he was knighted, Sir David Jason was 64, and Sir Terry Wogan was 66. Why are we still waiting?

Anyway, Dr Blockbuster wrote again to Gordon Brown on 1 January 2009. Do please remember that 41 MP's signed a motion in February 2008 urging the government to knight Bruce Forsyth for his 6 decades of "outstanding contribution to British Culture" !

This is a lifetime achievement award and who else could pull 21 million people together regularly for Saturday night FAMILY entertainment like Bruce did on the Generation Game.

Come join us!

Vince
"Dr Blockbuster"
"Give Bruce Forsyth a Knightood" Group

Recent Comments

Vince aka "Dr Blockbuster" on We've got (another) little list or two...
Indeed ... our "Give Bruce Forsyth a Kn...
Ian Shuttleworth on We've got (another) little list or two...
The hierarchy of civic honours can indee...

Content is copyright © 2012 The Stage Media Company Limited unless otherwise stated.

All RSS feeds are published for personal, non-commercial use. (What’s RSS?)