The Stage

Blogs

Shenton's View

Seven wonders of the world (of theatre)


I am finally on British soil again today, after landing this morning on the first flight to arrive into Heathrow at 4.40am, following a 22-hour flight from Sydney (plus a brief stop-over in Hong Kong; we were originally booked to make it a three-night stop-over there instead of a one-hour one, but Sydney was so gorgeous at the end of last week we cancelled Hong Kong and stayed in Australia until Sunday instead).

During my five weeks Down Under, I came face-to-face (or at least face-in-water or face-to-rockface) with three amazing natural wonders of the world, from the Great Barrier Reef and the Daintree Rain Forest, both of which I swam in, to the great giant rockfaces of Uluru and Kata Tjuta in the Australian Outback.

But tonight I’ll be back in the stalls to catch up at last on the Old Vic’s revival of Noises Off which opened while I was away, but I’ve seen in both its previous major West End outings: the transfer of the original production from Lyric Hammersmith to the Savoy, and then again in the last revival at the National that also transferred to the Piccadilly. One young critic Matt Trueman confidently wrote after seeing the current revival that the play is “one of the seven wonders of post-war theatre.”

The post-war theatre has produced some iconic plays, and Noises Off is, to be sure, a classic example of a farce about a farce, so brilliant in fact that it closed off the entire genre to writers for a generation, including Frayn himself in his own misfiring meta-theatre sequel Look Look. Likewise, the stage thriller was formally consigned to history after Peter Shaffer’s Sleuth took its own axe to it.

So if a show’s success can be measured by the impact it has on a wider generation of theatre making, what might the other six wonders of post-war theatre be? 

I’d personally have to start with the musicals of Stephen Sondheim — as Jeremy Sams once told me some years ago, “I venerate him as a human being and an artist. The only thing I have against him is that he’s covered every exit and nailed it up, and it’s very, very hard for everybody else. I’ve been listening to a lot of new musicals recently, and they either sound like Stephen or they so haven’t been influenced by him that his ghost is there in absentia. He is as big to musicals as Wagner is to opera, and the history of the musical will never be the same again until he is written out of it. And that will take a century.”

Sondheim has played with form in every musical he has written - one of his wittiest songs is called “I Never Do Anything Twice”, and his own career is living proof of that fact — so it’s hard to single out one show from them all that has nailed the exits more than the rest, but two shows, at least, which opened back-to-back with each other in the early 70s, proved that musicals would never be the same again.

Company, which originally premiered in 1970, revolutionised musicals by being about a concept instead of a plot, with the action set as a series of personal vignettes and sketches, possibly swirling around inside its leading character’s head; while Follies, the next year, marked a radical departure that paid tribute to a former era of musical entertainment in a dazzling study of imploding relationships that was literally about nailing the exits to a theatre that was going to be torn down and lives that its characters longed to escape from. And those are precisely the exits that Sams has said Sondheim has himself nailed up against those who have come after him.

But if Sondheim has been the dominant force in musical theatre transatlantically for the second half of the last century, in the UK we produced Andrew Lloyd Webber who also became a global force, and likewise broke new ground with two of his earliest shows Jesus Christ Superstar and Evita that again changed and challenged the form, driving it back to through-sung opera that came to dominate the musical for a while and lead directly to Les Miserables and Miss Saigon, amongst others.

Then there’s Mamma Mia!, of course, which ushered in a new generation of jukebox musicals constructed out of pop back catalogues that has changed the form again. Pop revues have long been with us, but Mamma Mia!, folding established songs into a new plot-led musical comedy, creating an often-imitated new genre that has led to such horrors as We Will Rock You and Rock of Ages.

Sondheim, Lloyd Webber and Mamma Mia! can therefore be said to be theatrical wonders for their wider and lasting impact on musical theatre; but what of plays, beyond Noises Off, that are theatrical wonders for ushering in new eras? Most obviously, of course, there’s John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger, which blew the cobwebs of dusty drawing-room plays that held sway until then in the West End and introduced a new age of theatrical realism in the theatre.

It followed hard upon Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, which went in the opposite direction to provide a daring poetic metaphor on the nature of existence itself. Harold Pinter’s desolate dramas would follow and re-work a heightened kind of realism with a different kind of theatricality.

But looking through the National Theatre’s One Hundred Plays of the Century list, created by a poll of playwrights, actors, directors, journalists and other theatre people at the turn of the 21st century, it’s difficult to single out which of those from 1945 onwards should qualify as ‘seven wonders of the post-war theatre’.

My own choices, from the NT’s list, would be Tennessee Williams’s A Streetcar Named Desire and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman for changing the nature of post-war American drama; Rattigan’s The Deep Blue Sea and Osborne’s Look Back in Anger (the latter supposedly overturning the former, but in fact both lending a charged intensity to their layered domestic settings — while Rattigan’s play is in the fact the one that changed my own life, as I’ve previously written here); Waiting for Godot and Noises Off (variations on an existential theme; one about filling in the time, the other about trying to — and failing — to hold off the chaos); and Martin Sherman’s Bent, for changing gay theatre forever.

What are yours? And what plays (and musicals) were missing from the NT’s list?

2 Comments

I'm a big (surprisingly young) ABBA fan (younger than most of their fans, anyway!) so I assumed that I would hate Mamma Mia; I thought they might have made it too silly, but I went to see it with my mother (who started the whole thing by listening to ABBA while I was in the womb) and I had a blast! We ended up standing with the rest of the audience, singing and dancing along to Dancing Queen, it was so much fun! I didn't mind the story either. I preferred the stage version over the movie, despite my Colin Firth lust. There's just something about being surrounded by the music. :)

I suggest the works of Robert Lepage for his unique and surefooted blend of visual theatre, devised approach, mix of languages and cultures, use of narrative threads, curiosity, collaborative ethos, openness to varied theatre practices, world theatre presence, global status and reach, etc., etc..

I'm sure that more knowledgeable people can point to precedents for each of these elements, but it seems to me that Robert Lepage emerged in one place - Quebec, which is significantly a bi-place - and encompassed the world.

Leave a comment

All comments must abide by our House Rules.

Recent Comments

Kenneth Griffin on Seven wonders of the world (of theatre)
I suggest the works of Robert Lepage for...
Grace Ryan on Seven wonders of the world (of theatre)
I'm a big (surprisingly young) ABBA fan ...

Content is copyright © 2012 The Stage Media Company Limited unless otherwise stated.

All RSS feeds are published for personal, non-commercial use. (What’s RSS?)