The Stage

Blogs

Shenton's View

Short Shorts 44: The power and pitfalls of Twitter, the Olympics and Superstar! - UPDATED

I may be on my honeymoon, but I’m inevitably still plugged into the theatre back home (whether in my main home of London or my new second home of New York).

Yes, I’m spending long days by the pool and on the beach in Provincetown on Cape Cod, and avoiding what passes for theatre here (mainly drag shows and tribute shows, with Naked Boys Singing making their inevitable annual appearance; as one handed me a card the other day on Commercial Street, I was tempted to say I’d come if he kept his clothes on, but restrained myself).

Twitter, of course, is one way that I maintain my connection to what’s going on, and what people are thinking and saying.

I’m happily avoiding the live broadcasts of Superstar!, for instance, but I know exactly when they’re taking place: my twitter timeline fills up with nothing but comments on it!

The ongoing power of twitter as a marketing tool has been much discussed. Just last week the Guardian reported that American comic Rob Delaney’s debut gigs at Soho Theatre in October sold out entirely on the strength of his 480,000 strong Twitter following, to “become he fastest-selling US act in the venue’s history.” In fact, he only had 900 seats to sell — he was only giving six performances at Soho’s downstairs space — but it still says something about the power of Twitter.


In another Guardian blog on the London fringe and its marketing challenges, one (unnamed) artistic director commented, “It’s as if the old ways of marketing have stopped being used and the new ways aren’t working yet.” And the Oval House’s Rebecca Atkinson-Lord added, “There is now so much noise from social media that people just switch off and don’t listen any more.”

Yet I’ve found direct evidence of a few people, at least, listening to me: after my tweets on the Young Vic’s current Doll’s House, one follower tweeted, “Just booked for A Doll’s House @YoungVicTheatre based on the incredible tweets of @ShentonStage”; and earlier this week, another said, “To those of you who say twitter/reviews make little impact these days,without @ShentonStage’s rave for A Dolls House I wouldn’t have booked!”

It gives me a glimmer of hope for the survival of professional criticism: in the white noise of so much competing opinion out there, people like this — neither of whom I know personally — have built up the kind of relationship with me on Twitter where they trust me enough to book on my say-so. It’s exactly what happens amongst a newspaper readership, too.


Arts organisations have inevitably seized on Twitter as a marketing tool. But they’re not always using it well. On the A Younger Theatre blog, Jake Orr has provided a compelling ten-step guide to the kind of mistakes they routinely make.

Amongst the pitfalls that he points out that I’m particularly aggravated by is the constant barrage of requests I get to ‘Pls RT” (retweet). As Jake points out, “Twitter is all about connections, and networks. By putting a tweet out it should filter out through your networks and reach potential new audiences in an organic manner when it is re-tweeted. You should never force tweets. If your tweet is good enough your follows will re-tweet it for you. Don’t beg for a re-tweet.” If I retweeted everything I was asked to, I’d simply be there all day. And a retweet is a kind of endorsement by me, too: I retweet things sometimes, but at my choosing, not theirs.

Again, Jake also urges departments within organisations to communicate properly between themselves — and suggests, “Breaking news on Twitter isn’t always good.” Only last week the new production of Taboo issued a tweet, “Announcing our ‘Boy George’! Making his professional debut in Taboo212, the insanely talented @MrRowlandTweet!” I retweeted it, then added, “Would be lovely if a press announcement about @TabooinBrixton was also forthcoming, not just a twitter one….!”


The Olympics are nearly upon us, or at least upon you in the UK (since I’m not there); we still don’t know what it’s immediate effect on West End theatrical traffic will be, even as the street traffic will no doubt snarl up for everyone not driving in a designated Olympic lane, but already we have news that only four shows will have evening performances a week today on the night of the Opening ceremony (while two others will have Friday matinees). UPDATE: SOLT have informed me the article I linked to above erroneously stated that only four shows were playing. “However, there are around 20 playing (figure going up to 25-30 if you could include Off West End & Fringe).”

Chicago — a show that has regularly survived on the kind of stunt casting that has seen the likes of Christie Brinkley, Jerry Springer, Lynda Carter, Ashlee Simpson, Kelly Osbourne and Sacha Distel taking turns through its rotating casts — has this week seen Robin Cousins, a Gold Olympics winner at the 1980 Winter Olympics, join the show; but it turns out that this is its last pirouette. Has the show been skating on thin ice for too long now? Maybe the Olympics has finally kicked it into touch.


Quote of the week: from Stuart Heritage’s Guardian blog on ITV’s Superstar: “As with all Andrew Lloyd Webber singing competitions, the prize is a starring role in a big theatrical production. But this is ITV, so the production in question is a gaudy arena tour of Jesus Christ Superstar that inexplicably co-stars Chris Moyles. Then, after that, a glittering career awaits the victor. Just look at Jodie Prenger, winner of the BBC’s 2008 I’d Do Anything, last seen whooping at some oranges during an episode of Food Factory. These are the glorious spoils that the winner can expect….”.

“…Superstar is vastly different from Lloyd Webber’s BBC shows. It feels trashier, less wholesome, nowhere near as welcoming. Host Amanda Holden is walked onstage by a pair of tuxedo-wearing Dreamboys for no reason whatsoever… And then there are the judges. Andrew Lloyd Webber, we know about. Following his BBC shows, he now has his persona - a kind of sleazy, smoking jacket-wearing Mr Toad - perfectly honed. This time, he’s flanked by Jason Donovan (the Poundland Gary Barlow), Dawn French (who appears to be there purely to make Amanda Holden seem less letchy) and Mel C.”

4 Comments

Hi Mark,

I agree with Stuart Heritage's view on Superstar; it's been hugely disappointing and has all the tacky hallmarks of an ITV production. If AW ever makes Stepford Wives: the Musical, then Amanda Holden should get the gig. It was only her cocking up the phone numbers last night (Thursday) that convinced me she wasn't an android.

However, I do take exception to his dismissal of Jodie Prenger and others. Either it's just lazy journalism or a bit snide. As you know, after Oliver Jodie toured with Spamalot and has been back in the West End in One Man, Two Guvnor's. Rachel Tucker, Samantha Barks (especially), Siobhan Dillon, Lauren Samuels, Aoife Mulholland, Niamh Perry have all proved they have talent beyond these shows and are not doomed to the reality TV circuit. "Maria" winner Connie Fisher was terrific in Wonderful Town and "Dorothy" winner Dannielle Hope has moved into Les Mis.

As I say, I agree with him about Superstar, but he should do some research or not ignore the facts just for the sake of a witty sentence.

Congrats on recent nuptials by the way.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2012-07-14/andrew-lloyd-webbers-rejects-where-are-they-now

Report this comment

what a travesty this show has turned out to be ! Where is the best jesus of any production in the past 20 years ? namely Steve Balsamo, a man who could sing them all off the stage, maybe he got a whiff of just how bad the show was going to be ? his new music video for 'I don't know why.' kind of kills off the jesus image though ( no bad thing)

Don't blame ITV for the shortcomings of "Superstar". I am sure ALW and his cronies had a say on how it should be produced, obviously not straying too far from the over-familiar and tired format.I cannot see the commercial side of it-do they think votes will turn to bums on seats with the voter paying to see the JC they voted for?Perhaps they should have had a section on who could perform the best miracle?

Please no more of trying to resurrect shows this way.

The official viewing figures for this series peaked at 2.7 million and last night (Monday), when it was supposed to be getting really exciting, it was down to 2.3 million. The nice weather wasn't a factor because Absolutely Fabulous got close to 6 million and EastEnders over 7. When you consider that the previous series on the BBC used to get in excess of 8 million and the prime function of the enterprise is to get bums on theatre seats, then Superstar must be considered a failure. Some genuine talent has come out of these shows, but viewers are clearly bored.

Leave a comment

All comments must abide by our House Rules.

Recent Comments

Tony Peters on Short Shorts 44: The power and pitfalls of Twitter, the Olympics and Superstar! - UPDATED
The official viewing figures for this se...
Mrs Spratt on Short Shorts 44: The power and pitfalls of Twitter, the Olympics and Superstar! - UPDATED
Don't blame ITV for the shortcomings of ...
jeff rees jones on Short Shorts 44: The power and pitfalls of Twitter, the Olympics and Superstar! - UPDATED
what a travesty this show has turned out...
Tony Peters on Short Shorts 44: The power and pitfalls of Twitter, the Olympics and Superstar! - UPDATED
Hi Mark, I agree with Stuart Heritage's...

Content is copyright © 2012 The Stage Media Company Limited unless otherwise stated.

All RSS feeds are published for personal, non-commercial use. (What’s RSS?)